robot.api package¶
robot.api package exposes the public APIs of Robot Framework.
Unless stated otherwise, the APIs exposed in this package are considered stable, and thus safe to use when building external tools on top of Robot Framework. Notice that all parsing APIs were rewritten in Robot Framework 3.2.
Currently exposed APIs are:
loggermodule for libraries’ logging purposes.decomodule with decorators libraries can utilize.exceptionsmodule containing exceptions that libraries can utilize for reporting failures and other events. These exceptions can be imported also directly viarobot.apilikefrom robot.api import SkipExecution.parsingmodule exposing the parsing APIs. This module is new in Robot Framework 4.0. Various parsing related functions and classes were exposed directly viarobot.apialready in Robot Framework 3.2, but they are effectively deprecated and will be removed in the future.TestSuiteclass for creating executable test suites programmatically andTestSuiteBuilderclass for creating such suites based on existing test data on the file system.SuiteVisitorabstract class for processing testdata before execution. This can be used as a base for implementing a pre-run modifier that is taken into use with--prerunmodifiercommandline option.ExecutionResult()factory method for reading execution results from XML output files andResultVisitorabstract class to ease further processing the results.ResultVisitorcan also be used as a base for pre-Rebot modifier that is taken into use with--prerebotmodifiercommandline option.ResultWriterclass for writing reports, logs, XML outputs, and XUnit files. Can write results based on XML outputs on the file system, as well as based on the result objects returned by theExecutionResult()or an executedTestSuite.
All of the above names can be imported like:
from robot.api import ApiName
See documentations of the individual APIs for more details.
Tip
APIs related to the command line entry points are exposed directly
via the robot root package.
Submodules¶
robot.api.deco module¶
-
robot.api.deco.not_keyword(func)[source]¶ Decorator to disable exposing functions or methods as keywords.
Examples:
@not_keyword def not_exposed_as_keyword(): # ... def exposed_as_keyword(): # ...
Alternatively the automatic keyword discovery can be disabled with the
library()decorator or by setting theROBOT_AUTO_KEYWORDSattribute to a false value.New in Robot Framework 3.2.
-
robot.api.deco.keyword(name=None, tags=(), types=())[source]¶ Decorator to set custom name, tags and argument types to keywords.
This decorator creates
robot_name,robot_tagsandrobot_typesattributes on the decorated keyword function or method based on the provided arguments. Robot Framework checks them to determine the keyword’s name, tags, and argument types, respectively.Name must be given as a string, tags as a list of strings, and types either as a dictionary mapping argument names to types or as a list of types mapped to arguments based on position. It is OK to specify types only to some arguments, and setting
typestoNonedisables type conversion altogether.If the automatic keyword discovery has been disabled with the
library()decorator or by setting theROBOT_AUTO_KEYWORDSattribute to a false value, this decorator is needed to mark functions or methods keywords.Examples:
@keyword def example(): # ... @keyword('Login as user "${user}" with password "${password}"', tags=['custom name', 'embedded arguments', 'tags']) def login(user, password): # ... @keyword(types={'length': int, 'case_insensitive': bool}) def types_as_dict(length, case_insensitive): # ... @keyword(types=[int, bool]) def types_as_list(length, case_insensitive): # ... @keyword(types=None]) def no_conversion(length, case_insensitive=False): # ...
-
robot.api.deco.library(scope=None, version=None, doc_format=None, listener=None, auto_keywords=False)[source]¶ Class decorator to control keyword discovery and other library settings.
By default disables automatic keyword detection by setting class attribute
ROBOT_AUTO_KEYWORDS = Falseto the decorated library. In that mode only methods decorated explicitly with thekeyword()decorator become keywords. If that is not desired, automatic keyword discovery can be enabled by usingauto_keywords=True.Arguments
scope,version,doc_formatandlistenerset the library scope, version, documentation format and listener by using class attributesROBOT_LIBRARY_SCOPE,ROBOT_LIBRARY_VERSION,ROBOT_LIBRARY_DOC_FORMATandROBOT_LIBRARY_LISTENER, respectively. These attributes are only set if the related arguments are given and they override possible existing attributes in the decorated class.Examples:
@library class KeywordDiscovery: @keyword def do_something(self): # ... def not_keyword(self): # ... @library(scope='GLOBAL', version='3.2') class LibraryConfiguration: # ...
The
@librarydecorator is new in Robot Framework 3.2.
robot.api.exceptions module¶
Exceptions that libraries can use for communicating failures and other events.
These exceptions can be imported also via the top level robot.api package like
from robot.api import SkipExecution.
This module and all exceptions are new in Robot Framework 4.0.
-
exception
robot.api.exceptions.Failure(message, html=False)[source]¶ Bases:
exceptions.AssertionErrorReport failed validation.
There is no practical difference in using this exception compared to using the standard
AssertionError. The main benefits are HTML support and that the name of this exception is consistent with other exceptions in this module.Parameters: - message – Exception message.
- html – When
True, message is considered to be HTML and not escaped.
-
ROBOT_SUPPRESS_NAME= True¶
-
args¶
-
message¶
-
exception
robot.api.exceptions.ContinuableFailure(message, html=False)[source]¶ Bases:
robot.api.exceptions.FailureReport failed validation but allow continuing execution.
Parameters: - message – Exception message.
- html – When
True, message is considered to be HTML and not escaped.
-
ROBOT_CONTINUE_ON_FAILURE= True¶
-
ROBOT_SUPPRESS_NAME= True¶
-
args¶
-
message¶
-
exception
robot.api.exceptions.Error(message, html=False)[source]¶ Bases:
exceptions.RuntimeErrorReport error in execution.
Failures related to the system not behaving as expected should typically be reported using the
Failureexception or the standardAssertionError. This exception can be used, for example, if the keyword is used incorrectly.There is no practical difference in using this exception compared to using the standard
RuntimeError. The main benefits are HTML support and that the name of this exception is consistent with other exceptions in this module.Parameters: - message – Exception message.
- html – When
True, message is considered to be HTML and not escaped.
-
ROBOT_SUPPRESS_NAME= True¶
-
args¶
-
message¶
-
exception
robot.api.exceptions.FatalError(message, html=False)[source]¶ Bases:
robot.api.exceptions.ErrorReport error that stops the whole execution.
Parameters: - message – Exception message.
- html – When
True, message is considered to be HTML and not escaped.
-
ROBOT_EXIT_ON_FAILURE= True¶
-
ROBOT_SUPPRESS_NAME= False¶
-
args¶
-
message¶
-
exception
robot.api.exceptions.SkipExecution(message, html=False)[source]¶ Bases:
exceptions.ExceptionMark the executed test or task skipped.
Parameters: - message – Exception message.
- html – When
True, message is considered to be HTML and not escaped.
-
ROBOT_SKIP_EXECUTION= True¶
-
ROBOT_SUPPRESS_NAME= True¶
-
args¶
-
message¶
robot.api.logger module¶
Public logging API for test libraries.
This module provides a public API for writing messages to the log file and the console. Test libraries can use this API like:
logger.info('My message')
instead of logging through the standard output like:
print('*INFO* My message')
In addition to a programmatic interface being cleaner to use, this API has a benefit that the log messages have accurate timestamps.
If the logging methods are used when Robot Framework is not running,
the messages are redirected to the standard Python logging module
using logger named RobotFramework.
Log levels¶
It is possible to log messages using levels TRACE, DEBUG, INFO,
WARN and ERROR either using the write() function or, more
commonly, with the log level specific trace(), debug(),
info(), warn(), error() functions.
By default the trace and debug messages are not logged but that can be
changed with the --loglevel command line option. Warnings and errors are
automatically written also to the console and to the Test Execution Errors
section in the log file.
Logging HTML¶
All methods that are used for writing messages to the log file have an
optional html argument. If a message to be logged is supposed to be
shown as HTML, this argument should be set to True. Alternatively,
write() accepts a pseudo log level HTML.
Example¶
from robot.api import logger
def my_keyword(arg):
logger.debug('Got argument %s.' % arg)
do_something()
logger.info('<i>This</i> is a boring example.', html=True)
-
robot.api.logger.write(msg, level='INFO', html=False)[source]¶ Writes the message to the log file using the given level.
Valid log levels are
TRACE,DEBUG,INFO(default),WARN, andERROR. Additionally it is possible to useHTMLpseudo log level that logs the message as HTML using theINFOlevel.Instead of using this method, it is generally better to use the level specific methods such as
infoanddebugthat have separatehtmlargument to control the message format.
-
robot.api.logger.trace(msg, html=False)[source]¶ Writes the message to the log file using the
TRACElevel.
-
robot.api.logger.debug(msg, html=False)[source]¶ Writes the message to the log file using the
DEBUGlevel.
-
robot.api.logger.info(msg, html=False, also_console=False)[source]¶ Writes the message to the log file using the
INFOlevel.If
also_consoleargument is set toTrue, the message is written both to the log file and to the console.
-
robot.api.logger.warn(msg, html=False)[source]¶ Writes the message to the log file using the
WARNlevel.
-
robot.api.logger.error(msg, html=False)[source]¶ Writes the message to the log file using the
ERRORlevel.
-
robot.api.logger.console(msg, newline=True, stream='stdout')[source]¶ Writes the message to the console.
If the
newlineargument isTrue, a newline character is automatically added to the message.By default the message is written to the standard output stream. Using the standard error stream is possibly by giving the
streamargument value'stderr'.
robot.api.parsing module¶
Public API for parsing, inspecting and modifying test data.
Exposed API¶
The publicly exposed parsing entry points are the following:
get_tokens(),get_resource_tokens(), andget_init_tokens()functions for parsing data to tokens.Tokenclass that contains all token types as class attributes.get_model(),get_resource_model(), andget_init_model()functions for parsing data to model represented as an abstract syntax tree (AST).- Model objects used by the AST model.
ModelVisitorto ease inspecting model and modifying data.ModelTransformerfor adding and removing nodes.
Note
This module is new in Robot Framework 4.0. In Robot Framework 3.2 functions
for getting tokens and model as well as the Token
class were exposed directly via the robot.api package, but other
parts of the parsing API were not publicly exposed. All code targeting
Robot Framework 4.0 or newer should use this module because parsing related
functions and classes will be removed from robot.api in the future.
Note
Parsing was totally rewritten in Robot Framework 3.2 and external
tools using the parsing APIs need to be updated. Depending on
the use case, it may be possible to use the higher level
TestSuiteBuilder() instead.
Parsing data to tokens¶
Data can be parsed to tokens by using
get_tokens(),
get_resource_tokens() or
get_init_tokens() functions depending on whether the data
represent a test case (or task) file, a resource file, or a suite
initialization file. In practice the difference between these functions is
what settings and sections are valid.
Typically the data is easier to inspect and modify by using the higher level
model discussed in the next section, but in some cases having just the tokens
can be enough. Tokens returned by the aforementioned functions are
Token instances and they have the token type, value,
and position easily available as their attributes. Tokens also have useful
string representation used by the example below:
from robot.api.parsing import get_tokens
path = 'example.robot'
for token in get_tokens(path):
print(repr(token))
If the example.robot used by the above example would contain
*** Test Cases ***
Example
Keyword argument
Second example
Keyword xxx
*** Keywords ***
Keyword
[Arguments] ${arg}
Log ${arg}
then the beginning of the output got when running the earlier code would look like this:
Token(TESTCASE_HEADER, '*** Test Cases ***', 1, 0)
Token(EOL, '\n', 1, 18)
Token(EOS, '', 1, 19)
Token(TESTCASE_NAME, 'Example', 2, 0)
Token(EOL, '\n', 2, 7)
Token(EOS, '', 2, 8)
Token(SEPARATOR, ' ', 3, 0)
Token(KEYWORD, 'Keyword', 3, 4)
Token(SEPARATOR, ' ', 3, 11)
Token(ARGUMENT, 'argument', 3, 15)
Token(EOL, '\n', 3, 23)
Token(EOS, '', 3, 24)
Token(EOL, '\n', 4, 0)
Token(EOS, '', 4, 1)
The output shows the token type, value, line number and column offset. When finding
tokens by their type, the constants in the Token class such
as Token.TESTCASE_NAME and Token.EOL should be used instead the values
of these constants like 'TESTCASE NAME' and 'EOL'. These values have
changed slightly in Robot Framework 4.0 and they may change in the future as well.
The EOL tokens denote end of a line and they include the newline character
and possible trailing spaces. The EOS tokens denote end of a logical
statement. Typically a single line forms a statement, but when the ...
syntax is used for continuation, a statement spans multiple lines. In
special cases a single line can also contain multiple statements.
Errors caused by unrecognized data such as non-existing section or setting names
are handled during the tokenizing phase. Such errors are reported using tokens
that have ERROR type and the actual error message in their error attribute.
Syntax errors such as empty FOR loops are only handled when building the higher
level model discussed below.
See the documentation of get_tokens() for details
about different ways how to specify the data to be parsed, how to control
should all tokens or only data tokens be returned, and should variables in
keyword arguments and elsewhere be tokenized or not.
Parsing data to model¶
Data can be parsed to a higher level model by using
get_model(),
get_resource_model(), or
get_init_model() functions depending on the type of
the parsed file same way as when parsing data to tokens.
The model is represented as an abstract syntax tree (AST) implemented on top of Python’s standard ast.AST class. To see how the model looks like, it is possible to use the ast.dump() function or the third-party astpretty module:
import ast
import astpretty
from robot.api.parsing import get_model
model = get_model('example.robot')
print(ast.dump(model, include_attributes=True))
print('-' * 72)
astpretty.pprint(model)
Running this code with the example.robot file from the previous
section would produce so much output that it is not included here. If
you are going to work with Robot Framework’s AST, you are recommended to
try that on your own.
Model objects¶
The model is build from nodes that are based ast.AST and further categorized
to blocks and statements. Blocks can contain other blocks and statements as
child nodes whereas statements only have tokens containing the actual data as
Token instances. Both statements and blocks expose
their position information via lineno, col_offset, end_lineno and
end_col_offset attributes and some nodes have also other special attributes
available.
Blocks:
File(the root of the model)SettingSectionVariableSectionTestCaseSectionKeywordSectionCommentSectionTestCaseKeywordForIf
Statements:
SectionHeaderLibraryImportResourceImportVariablesImportDocumentationMetadataForceTagsDefaultTagsSuiteSetupSuiteTeardownTestSetupTestTeardownTestTemplateTestTimeoutVariableTestCaseNameKeywordNameSetupTeardownTagsTemplateTimeoutArgumentsReturnKeywordCallTemplateArgumentsForHeaderIfHeaderElseIfHeaderElseHeaderEndCommentErrorEmptyLine
Inspecting model¶
The easiest way to inspect what data a model contains is implementing
ModelVisitor and creating
visit_NodeName to visit nodes with name NodeName as needed.
The following example illustrates how to find what tests a certain test
case file contains:
from robot.api.parsing import get_model, ModelVisitor
class TestNamePrinter(ModelVisitor):
def visit_File(self, node):
print(f"File '{node.source}' has following tests:")
# Call `generic_visit` to visit also child nodes.
self.generic_visit(node)
def visit_TestCaseName(self, node):
print(f"- {node.name} (on line {node.lineno})")
model = get_model('example.robot')
printer = TestNamePrinter()
printer.visit(model)
When the above code is run using the earlier example.robot, the
output is this:
File 'example.robot' has following tests:
- Example (on line 2)
- Second example (on line 5)
Handling errors in model¶
All nodes in the model have errors attribute that contains possible errors
the node has. These errors include syntax errors such as empty FOR loops or IF
without a condition as well as errors caused by unrecognized data such as
non-existing section or setting names.
Unrecognized data is handled already during the tokenizing phase. In the model
such data is represented as Error
nodes and their errors attribute contain error information got from the
underlying ERROR tokens. Syntax errors do not create
Error
nodes, but instead the model has normal nodes such as
If
with errors in their errors attribute.
A simple way to go through the model and see are there errors is using the
ModelVisitor
discussed in the previous section:
class ErrorReporter(ModelVisitor):
# Implement `generic_visit` to visit all nodes.
def generic_visit(self, node):
if node.errors:
print(f'Error on line {node.lineno}:')
for error in node.errors:
print(f'- {error}')
ModelVisitor.generic_visit(self, node)
Modifying data¶
Existing data the model contains can be modified simply by modifying values of
the underlying tokens. If changes need to be saved, that is as easy as calling
the save() method of the root model object. When
just modifying token values, it is possible to still use
ModelVisitor
discussed in the above section. The next section discusses adding or removing
nodes and then
ModelTransformer
should be used instead.
Modifications to tokens obviously require finding the tokens to be modified.
The first step is finding nodes containing the tokens by implementing
needed visit_NodeName methods. Then the exact token or tokens
can be found using nodes’
get_token() or
get_tokens() methods.
If only token values are needed,
get_value() or
get_values() can be used as a shortcut.
First finding nodes and then the right tokens is illustrated by
this keyword renaming example:
from robot.api.parsing import get_model, ModelVisitor, Token
class KeywordRenamer(ModelVisitor):
def __init__(self, old_name, new_name):
self.old_name = self.normalize(old_name)
self.new_name = new_name
def normalize(self, name):
return name.lower().replace(' ', '').replace('_', '')
def visit_KeywordName(self, node):
'''Rename keyword definitions.'''
if self.normalize(node.name) == self.old_name:
token = node.get_token(Token.KEYWORD_NAME)
token.value = self.new_name
def visit_KeywordCall(self, node):
'''Rename keyword usages.'''
if self.normalize(node.keyword) == self.old_name:
token = node.get_token(Token.KEYWORD)
token.value = self.new_name
model = get_model('example.robot')
renamer = KeywordRenamer('Keyword', 'New Name')
renamer.visit(model)
model.save()
If you run the above example using the earlier example.robot, you
can see that the Keyword keyword has been renamed to New Name. Notice
that a real keyword renamer needed to take into account also keywords used
with setups, teardowns and templates.
When token values are changed, column offset of the other tokens on same line are likely to be wrong. This does not affect saving the model or other typical usages, but if it is a problem then the caller needs to updated offsets separately.
Adding and removing nodes¶
Bigger changes to the model are somewhat more complicated than just modifying
existing token values. When doing this kind of changes,
ModelTransformer
should be used instead of
ModelVisitor
that was discussed in the previous sections.
Removing nodes is relative easy and is accomplished by returning None
from visit_NodeName methods. Remember to return the original node,
or possibly a replacement node, from all of these methods when you do not
want a node to be removed.
Adding nodes requires constructing needed Model objects and adding them
to the model. The following example demonstrates both removing and adding nodes.
If you run it against the earlier example.robot, you see that
the first test gets a new keyword, the second test is removed, and
settings section with documentation is added.
from robot.api.parsing import (
get_model, Documentation, EmptyLine, KeywordCall,
ModelTransformer, SettingSection, SectionHeader, Token
)
class TestModifier(ModelTransformer):
def visit_TestCase(self, node):
# The matched `TestCase` node is a block with `header` and
# `body` attributes. `header` is a statement with familiar
# `get_token` and `get_value` methods for getting certain
# tokens or their value.
name = node.header.get_value(Token.TESTCASE_NAME)
# Returning `None` drops the node altogether i.e. removes
# this test.
if name == 'Second example':
return None
# Construct new keyword call statement from tokens. See `visit_File`
# below for an example creating statements using `from_params`.
new_keyword = KeywordCall([
Token(Token.SEPARATOR, ' '),
Token(Token.KEYWORD, 'New Keyword'),
Token(Token.SEPARATOR, ' '),
Token(Token.ARGUMENT, 'xxx'),
Token(Token.EOL)
])
# Add the keyword call to test as the second item.
node.body.insert(1, new_keyword)
# No need to call `generic_visit` because we are not
# modifying child nodes. The node itself must to be
# returned to avoid dropping it.
return node
def visit_File(self, node):
# Create settings section with documentation. Needed header and body
# statements are created using `from_params` method. This is typically
# more convenient than creating statements based on tokens like above.
settings = SettingSection(
header=SectionHeader.from_params(Token.SETTING_HEADER),
body=[
Documentation.from_params('This is a really\npowerful API!'),
EmptyLine.from_params()
]
)
# Add settings to the beginning of the file.
node.sections.insert(0, settings)
# Call `generic_visit` to visit also child nodes.
return self.generic_visit(node)
model = get_model('example.robot')
TestModifier().visit(model)
model.save('modified.robot')
Executing model¶
It is possible to convert a parsed and possibly modified model into an
executable TestSuite structure by using its
from_model() class method. In this case
the get_model() function should be given the curdir
argument to get possible ${CURDIR} variable resolved correctly.
from robot.api import TestSuite
from robot.api.parsing import get_model
model = get_model('example.robot', curdir='/home/robot/example')
# modify model as needed
suite = TestSuite.from_model(model)
suite.run()
For more details about executing the created
TestSuite object, see the documentation
of its run() method. Notice also
that if you do not need to modify the parsed model, it is easier to
get the executable suite by using the
from_file_system() class method.